Start with SFO Mag. June 2007 Issue

Crystal Ball Looks into Green Issues in Green 2007

Green Imperatives for "Going Green"

Crystal Ball Reports 2007

Crystal Ball Looks into Green Issues in Green 2007

The Future of the Unborn and the Innovations for a Great Future Depend on The Very Best Leadership.

Crystal Ball Reports 2007

Hello Concerned Investors, Colleagues, and Citizens:

There is alot of talk about "Global Warming" and many very important

events coming up that address the potencial

for gainful approaches to solving our largest problems. Stock Futures

and Options Magazine is to be commended

for their epic June 2007 www.sfomag.com issue with the theme of green

investing. All serious investors and

trend setters need to purchase that issue by going to www.sfomag.com

and ordering it through the convenient

shopping cart provided for back issues.

Although the ultimate Crystal Ball would merge advanced systems design

with PSI enabling tools,

the current Crystal Ball model works due to the unified field, and it's

multidimensional construct into the future,

the present, and the past.

There are real worries about 2007 because it is a year that ends in 7.

Yet, through thinking positive, rather

than be victimized by fear mentality- we can be sure that 2007 ends

well.  Mind over Matter!

Heres to the security of our financial future through wisdom as the

ultimate toolset.

Sincerely,

Ms. Moore

www.mediaconnect3.4t.com

Can war bias unilateralism coexist with growing green environmental

protection imperatives?  No

Are the climate change risks of global warming severe enough to mandate

manditory caps on carbon dioxide emissions?  Yes

Pushing US compliance with Kyoto Protocols?  Yes

Are "global warming" regulations the cornerstone of protection and

advancement of the "new paradigm" of the digital era?  Yes

Can the digital age advance w/o compliance with CO2 caps & ecological

based imperatives?  No

The rigorous demands of Kyoto Protocols and their complementary accords

are the ultimate

valuation model for sure sustainability?   Yes

Can war schemes and agenda coincide with the rigorous demands of

curbing greenhouse gas emissions, protecting water supplies, farming, and weather

stability?   No

Is there a direct correlation between extreme climate volatility and

persistant practises of bombings, violations of Nuremberg Conventions, depleted uranium war

uses, etc.?  Yes

On a scale from 1-10, what figure of impact?  6

Are atmospheric damages caused by long term and short term war games a

major contributory factor towards raising the earth's temperature 5 degrees?   No

on a scale from 1-10, what figure of impact?  3

Would raising the earth's temperature 5 degrees actualize the economic

and ecological devastation porojected by the Stern Review?   Yes

Is there still room for "debate" over the extent of human impact on

global warming?  No

10 million metric tons of emissions in 2006 was traded on CCX.

Enough impact to curb and control greenhouse gases?   No

What figure would be enough to curb and congrol greenhouse gases in

reference to

a gainful role of CCX?   40 million metric tons

Preferable to approach emissions reduction with an approach that favors

profitable cap and trade systems verses manditory caps?   No

Is the launch of CCX and CCFE  Chicago Climate Exchange and Chicago

Climate Futures Exchange, and all such exchanges be a sufficient platform to control global

warming alone?   No

How many firms will have to participate to insure a sufficient impact

on global warming?   300

How many metric tons of emissions will have to change hands?   40 million metric tons

Current figure  1.5 million metric tons.

Will the new wave of emissions control proponents insure the secure

future of CCX , and other emission cap and trade platforms be the preferrable approach for taking

care of corpporate responsible "global warming policies?     Unsure

Will the costs and risks associaated with the reductions accrued

through gainful growth of the CCX, CCFE, and other emissions platforms be best managed through integrating a tax

approach to the trading criteria?   No

Is climate change risk the "sin qua non" challenging shareholder value

going forward into the new digital age?   No

Will the Bush pre-emptive strike doctrine supported by it's ficticious

ideology of War on Terror spell the downfall of the US as Warld leader?   No/Unsure

Is the failure to indict Bush/Clinton for their long term 9/11

preplanned and financed Fahrenheit 9/11 the worst error of western society entering the New Era?   No/Unsure

Does Bush pre-emptive strike doctrine depend on the following of key

americans who refuse to understand the complex interdependency between "Global War on Terror"

and US foreign policy?  No

On Pentagon directives?   Yes

Will the "War on Terror" destroy globalism?  No

Diminish Globalism by what figure?   40%

At the cost of its demonstrative costs and tolls, is the current "spin"

on the threat of Al Queda accurate?  No

The growth of terror groups can be countered through a change in US foreign policy    Yes

Is the growth of terror groups dependent on the deliberate control and

conquer schemes of the US administration in reference to Peak Oil targets, preemptive

strike doctrine, and US violations of International laws and progressive tracks for maximal global growth and

development based on standards based benchmarks and cooperative approaches?    Yes

Towards upheavals  in small countries on scale from 1-10?   3

US lead assasinations of foreign heads of state on scale from 1-10?  4

Impact of US covert operations on scale from 1-10?  6

Iran/Contra type US/allied strategies on a scale from 1-10?   7

In that context of real baseline, can the US expect to win the "War on

Terror"?   No

Will the rules based greenhouse gas emissions reduction and trading

program put in motion by CCX, CCFE, and European Climate Exchange be accepted by a

majority of global industries?   No

Can be carried and promoted in a pro-active Global Compact agenda?   No

Can work w/o massive funding of next generation energy systems?  No

Can work w/o new timetable for next generation automotive engines?  No

Can work w/o the definative end of the Cheney led global "War on

Terror"  No

What is the accurate figure required to satisfy COs reductions verses

the 20% by 2017 figure advanced by the Bush Admin. proposal?    60%

Raising production of alternative fuels to 35 billion gallons verses

7.5 billion gallons by 2012 is the right production figure?  No

re: Energy Act of 2005- 7.5 billion figure

What is the correct figure?   65-70 billion gallons

What production figure of alternative fuels will support the reduction

of greenhouse gases and next generation energy growth and development?

2006-2008?   5.6-9 Billion gallons

2008-2010?  17 Billion gallons

2010-2012? 70 Billion gallons

Today 10% ethanol is the common blend in unleaded gasoline, is that

percentage sufficient? No

Should blending percentage reach 20%  No

Should blending percentage reach 30%  Yes

Is the 51 cent credit to ethanol blenders the winning trend in

political generated incentives?  Yes

Imperative?  Yes

Economically crucial?  Yes

Is Hubbert Linearization technique an accurate formula to estimate year

of "peak oil" world oil production crisis?    No

Will years of declining world oil production lead to social, economic,

and political dislocation?  No

Can peak oil projections be offset by parallel alternative energy

targets that correlate in real time?  Yes

Can global demand for oil be accomodated by a rapid shift to

alternative fuels percentages targets to offset diminishing supplies from existing and targeted oil sources?

Yes

OPAC, Oil Depletion Analysis Center indicates unbridgeable

supply/demand gap opening up after 2007. Is their projection correct?  No

USGS Geological Survey, estimated that the year of peak oil is as far

off as 2035, correct?  No

Will other energy sources to replace oil be developed in time to fill

energy supply/demand gap created by assumed "peak oil" spikes as what have accrued when the price of oil has risen starting in July 2006?  Yes

Is ethanol the exclusive alternative energy fuel to base targets for

production for blending?  Yes

For hybrid engines?  No

For ethanol running engines?   Yes

What can explain the huge jump to 70 Billion tons of alternative energy

production in 2012?

ethanol running engines?  No

production across globe?  Yes

Subsidies for ethanol production in 3rd World?   Yes

To satisfy accurate targets of alternative energy production, what

percentage depends on

simulations based on time line correlations?

On scale from 1-10?   6

2006-2008   10%

2008-2010   20%

2012-2014   30%

What year would spike alternative auto engine production according to

what percentage? 2016

According to what percentage?   40%

Disclaimer: The Crystal Ball Reports depends on an alternative channel

made possible through the unified field of PSI, and physics. Check out Crystal Ball Reports

of 2002, for more technical and informational basis for understanding the accuracy of the

model.

Media Connect is not responsible for the impact of the accuracy of it's

Crystal Ball Reports.

Through approach of the imperatives in a pro-active way in real time

with current "Green" conferences, articles, and society focus- Media Connect aims to turn a

potencially bad investment year ending in 7, into a very gainful and positive "new

trend" for maximal success and prosperity of the growing futures led digital financial

expansion.

re: www.mediaconnect3.4t.com.